I think your subheadline is a law that should be widely taught and recognized. If a statistic used is not the most obvious or expected one it implies the journalist already checked that one and discarded it as it didn’t say what they wanted it to
I feel like you did quite the high-integrity move, especially in comparison to The Washington Post, who likely would've done a stealth edit and moved on.
I think your subheadline is a law that should be widely taught and recognized. If a statistic used is not the most obvious or expected one it implies the journalist already checked that one and discarded it as it didn’t say what they wanted it to
I feel like you did quite the high-integrity move, especially in comparison to The Washington Post, who likely would've done a stealth edit and moved on.